Zen

Source string Source string

197/10000 · 197

The string is read-only.

English Actions
|FE-NEEDSPONSOR |The submitter requires a sponsor; the review can be done by anyone, but a sponsor will need to come and sponsor the submitter.
|FE-DEADREVIEW |The review has been closed out because the submitter has left; users looking for packages to submit may find some possibilities in these dead tickets.
|FE-Legal |The package is currently awaiting review by the legal team.
The Whiteboard
To save time for reviewers, the https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/reviewable.html[New, reviewable Fedora package review tickets] page will hide certain tickets which are not reviewable. The _Whiteboard_ field can be used to mark a ticket with various additional bits of status which will cause it to be hidden or displayed differently.
|NotReady |The package is not yet ready for review. It is possible to open a review ticket, mark it as NotReady, and continue to work on it until it's ready to be seen by a reviewer.
|BuildFails |The package fails to build.
|AwaitingSubmitter |The package review is stalled and cannot proceed without input from the submitter.
|Trivial |The package is trivial to review. See below.
|Unretirement |A re-review needed to xref:Package_Retirement_Process.adoc#claiming[claim ownership] of a retired package .
The `Trivial` status is intended to indicate packages which, as an aid to new reviewers, are especially uncomplicated and easy to review. A ticket should not be marked as being trivial unless:
The package is known to build and a link to a scratch build is included.
The ticket explains any rpmlint output which is present.
The spec contains nothing which is unnecessary in modern Fedora (such as `BuildRoot:`, a `%clean` section or `%defattr`).
The spec is free from excessive or complicated macro usage.
The spec uses only the least complicated scriptlets which are taken directly from the xref:packaging-guidelines::Scriptlets.adoc[Scriptlets] page.
The package contains no daemons.
The package is not especially security sensitive.
The code has undergone a thorough inspection for licensing issues. Anomalies which would be found by `licensecheck` should be explained.
In short, this should be reserved only for those tickets which should be easily approachable by someone doing their first package review.
Tracking of Package Requests
The https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/[Package Review Tracker] provides various review-related reports and a simple way to search for reviews by package name or reporter name or others.

Loading…

User avatar None

String added in the repository
The https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/[Package Review Tracker] provides various review-related reports and a simple way to search for reviews by package name or reporter name or others.
The https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/[Package Review Tracker] provides various review-related reports and a simple way to search for reviews by package name or reporter name or others.
7 months ago
Browse all string changes

Things to check

Long untranslated

The string has not been translated for a long time

Reset

Glossary

English English
No related strings found in the glossary.

18158979 String information

Source string description
type: Plain text
Flags
placeholders:r"`[\w\d -_<>(){}\[\]@$;.\*+=]*`":r"(link:)?https?://[\w\d\-_#?&%=\./]*":r"xref:[\w\d\-_/]*\.adoc(#[\w\d\-_/]*)?", read-only
Source string location
./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:323
String age
7 months ago
Last updated
6 months ago
Source string age
7 months ago
Translation file
pot/master/pages/Package_Review_Process.pot, string 76